Home | Ask Your Question | Mortgage Glossary
Find me a lender for:  

Why Do Lenders Itemize Loan Charges?

Why Do Lenders Itemize Loan Charges?

July 20, 1998

"Wouldn't taking out a mortgage be less of an ordeal if lenders, instead of charging borrowers a bunch of different fees, charged a single fee covering everything? Why don't they?"

You have put your finger on one of the needless complexities and irritations of our home loan marketplace. To illustrate the point, here are some of the individual charges I have extracted from various loan settlement sheets: affiliate consulting fee, amortization fee, appraisal fee, credit report, underwriting fee, bank inspection fee, processing fee, lender's inspection fee, settlement fee, signup fee, funding fee, lender's attorney fee, endorsement fee, express mail fee, document preparation fee, notary fee, messenger fee, photograph fee, assumption fee, administrative fee, document review fee, and translation fee.

In other markets consumers wouldn't stand for this. Suppose, for example, when you went to the movies the ticket clerk said "the access charge will be $3, the usher's service is $1.50, your share of our rent is $.75´┐Żand we won't be completely certain of these charges until you come out so you will have to line up again for a final reckoning." You probably would go home to watch television! Yet in the home loan market consumers tolerate this nonsense.

The absurd practice of charging for specific itemized services involved in making a loan rather than for the total service goes back to the days when state usury laws restricted the interest rate and fees lenders were allowed to charge. If the maximum allowable interest rate was 6%, for example, but some loans were more costly to administer than others, law makers found it reasonable to allow lenders to recover their higher costs without viewing it as a violation.

Not surprisingly, lenders became imaginative in finding ways to categorize their expenses such that the law would allow them to collect fees from the borrower. And since the acceptable categories varied from state to state, the result was a crazy quilt patch of rules across the nation that still exists, even though the usury laws no longer limit the rates that lenders can charge on home loans.

Some lenders today have indeed adopted the practice of charging a single dollar fee at closing rather than a myriad of separate charges, and they should get medals. But most lenders continue to itemize charges because they believe that they can extract more in total from the borrower that way. This reflects both their dim view of the shopping acumen of the typical borrower, and the role of the Federal Government which unwittingly supports this view.

While state government regulation provided the original impetus for itemized pricing, Federal Government regulation perpetuates it. The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 ("RESPA") sanctions itemized pricing by providing space on the required Good Faith Estimate of Settlement ("GFE") for any expense category a lender wishes to use. Further, the GSE intermixes lender charges with charges of third parties (for insurance, taxes and the like) and total lender charges are not shown anywhere. In other words, the GFE provides borrowers with all the detail for which they have no use, but no total, which is the only number they really need.

But it gets worse. Because some third party charges are not known with certainty until late in the process, the entire GFE is viewed as an "estimate", although lenders obviously know their own charges with certainty. Viewing lender charges as estimates encourages the practice of some less scrupulous loan officers and mortgage brokers of "overlooking" certain charges at the outset, only to discover them later when it is too late for the borrower to back out.

If RESPA were scrapped, the practice of quoting a single dollar fee would evolve quickly. In the meantime, you must navigate as best you can on your own.  I'll explain how in How to Shop Settlement Costs.]

Copyright Jack Guttentag 2002


Jack Guttentag is Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Visit the Mortgage Professor's web site for more answers to commonly asked questions.

Search More Info On:

  • notary fee
  • closing fee
  • notary fees
  • amortization report
  • borrower
  • mortgage fee
  • Shop For Your Mortgage Now!
    Shop For Your Mortgage Now!

    You'll be re-directed to Top-Lenders.com


    Related Articles From Mortgage Professor's web site:

    Mortgage Auction (or Lead Generation) Sites
    May 20, 2002 I Do Auction Sites Work For Borrowers? "You have discussed internet referral sites and individual lender sites, but I don?t see any reference to Lending Tree, which does a lot of advertising. Where does it fit?" Lending Tree is what I call ... more...

    HUD's Proposals For Reform
    October 19, 2002 On July 29, 2002, HUD released a set of proposals to substantially change the ways in which home loans are originated in the US.  As usual, the proposals were open for comment, and many thousands of them were received.  Mine was among them, and is shown ... more...

    Fixing the Mortgage System So It Works For Borrowers
    September 5, 2005 In some respects, the United States housing finance system is the best in the world. In other respects, it is unworthy of a banana republic. Our housing finance system has a primary market and a secondary market. The primary market is the market the borrower ... more...

    HUD and Yield Spread Premiums
    October 3, 2001 The recent decision of the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Culpepper vs Irwin has suddenly swung the spotlight on HUD policy regarding yield spread premiums (YSPs) retained by mortgage brokers.  To this date, HUD has been impotent in dealing ... more...

    More on lenders...